James is a specialist personal injury and clinical negligence barrister. He appears regularly for both claimants and defendants in a wide range of hearings such as: fast track and multi-track trials, CCMCs, interlocutory applications, inquests and appeals.
He is happy to consider any case with representation under a CFA and will not levy any fee if prospects are insufficient.
James is flexible, approachable and aims to turn around any papers within 14 days. He is happy to talk matters through informally on the telephone prior to instruction if needs be.
James has a busy personal injury practice, and is often in court up to four to five times per week. He is instructed by both claimants and defendants in a range of fast-track and multi-track matters, and has experience in cases involving:
The value of James's caseload varies, but he is instructed in a number of high five and six-figure claims. For example, he recently settled a personal injury matter at a JSM where the claim was pleaded in excess of £1m. All issues were in dispute.
He is also used to dealing with applications concerned with the interpretation of the fixed costs and QOCS provisions. See for example Magon v RSA, where James acted for the successful claimant/appellant in a case dealing with QOCS and discontinuance. He has given multiple talks on the same topic, and is well versed in arguing over the exceptions to the general rule.
James is also often instructed in cases involving an element of fraud and/or dishonesty and has obtained findings of the same for defendants on several occasions. He has written a book titled: 'A practical guide to QOCS and Fundamental Dishonesty', and which can be purchased at: http://www.lawbriefpublishing.com/product/qocsandfundamentaldishonesty/
James has built up a successful clinical negligence practice that covers a wide range of issues. He is currently a co-author for the revised Clinical Negligence chapter in the Butterworths Personal Injury Litigation Service manual (publication date TBC).
Examples of recent work includes cases involving:
Most of James' clinical negligence work involves five and six figure claims where at least three or more experts have been instructed for each side. He recently settled a case pleaded in excess of £400,000 at a JSM where there was dispute between the parties' psychiatric and rheumatology experts as to the nature (and existence) of the claimant's pain condition.
James has also been instructed as a junior or second junior in seven and eight figure cases involving injuries at birth.
He is happy to appear at inquests where there are some prospects of success.
James has been instructed in numerous CCMCs (for claimants and defendants), interim payment applications, provisional and detailed assessments (including in the SCCO). His busy personal injury and clinical negligence practice means that he is also regularly instructed to deal with the more discreet points of costs law that involve the fixed costs provisions, the QOCS provisions, and Part 36.
Recent examples of such work include cases concerning:
James frequently delivers training for solicitors and costs firms, and has been invited to speak on costs at national events such as the 2018 conference for the Society of Clinical Injury Lawyers. He also regularly writes about costs related matters for various websites, and has recently written a book on QOCS and fundamental dishonesty, titled: 'A practical guide to QOCS and Fundamental Dishonesty', and which can be purchased here.
‘James has a fantastic eye for detail. He is also great with clients and witnesses in conference before trial.’
A junior barrister with considerable expertise in public liability claims. He is adept at handling psychiatric injury and head injury claims, and is regularly instructed in cases involving allegations of fraud or dishonesty. He acts for both claimants and defendants.
Strengths: "Approachable and very good with clients." "Helpful, knowledgeable and a confident advocate. He provides an exceptional service."
Recent work: Acted for a claimant who sustained a mildly traumatic brain injury after crossing the road.
"Recommended for cases involving allegations of fundamental dishonesty."