We have adopted a specialist team approach to our practices for many years. We feel that this is the way our clients want us to work, and that specialisation leads to the provision of a better service.
Insights
06/03/2024
The Employment Appeal Tribunal handed down the judgment in Edwards v Ministry of Defence yesterday, dismissing the appeal.
The claimant, a Lance Corporal in the British Armed Forces, had sought to bring a claim of race discrimination and applied to amend her claim to bring claims sex discrimination, harassment related to sex and victimisation. At first instance, the Employment Tribunal determined that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the race discrimination claim and refused the application to amend, because the claimant had not made a service complaint about any of those “matters”, as required by section 121(1) of the Equality Act 2010.
The claimant appealed, raising – among other issues – that the approach of the Employment Judge was not consistent with the rights guaranteed by Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
In dismissing the appeal, the Employment Appeal Tribunal gave helpful guidance on the meaning of raising a service complaint about the ‘matter’, which will be relevant to future claims under the Equality Act 2010 involving members of the Armed Forces. In particular:
Julian Allsop and Anna Williams, led by Adam Tolley KC, successfully appeared on behalf of the Ministry of Defence. They were instructed by the Government Legal Department.
A link to the judgment is here: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/eat/2024/18
Sign up
To be kept up-to-date with our latest news and future events, please complete the short form.
A member of the clerking team will help you resolve your request.