Dr Philip Hughes

Call 2017

“Philip always provides very comprehensive, thorough and easy to understand advice.”

Contact Philip

0117 930 9000

For enquiries please contact

Stephen Arnold
Practice Director - Civil
0117 930 9000
Click here to email

Chloe Amson
Assistant Practice Manager - Personal Injury, Clinical Negligence and Court of Protection (Health & Welfare)
0117 930 9000
Click here to email

Rob McDonald
Practice Manager - Employment & Discrimination, Costs & Litigation Funding
0117 930 9000
Click here to email

“Philip always provides very comprehensive, thorough and easy to understand advice.”

Chambers & Partners 2024

“He provides an excellent level of service.”

Chambers & Partners 2024

“Philip Hughes is increasingly sought after for his medical expertise, which he has brought to bear…”

Legal 500 2024

MA (Hons) Cantab, MB, BChir, Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge
GDL (Distinction), BPP Law School
BPTC (Very Competent) BPP Law School

Philip Hughes is a specialist Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence practitioner who deals solely with multi-track litigation. He represents both claimants and defendants on the full spectrum of issues within these practice areas, including at Inquests and in associated Costs matters.

He is recommended by both Chambers & Partners and Legal 500.

“Philip always provides very comprehensive, thorough and easy to understand advice.” Chambers & Partners 2024

“He provides an excellent level of service.” Chambers & Partners 2024

“Philip Hughes is increasingly sought after for his medical expertise, which he has brought to bear…” Legal 500 2024

Expertise

Philip has a well-established Claimant Personal Injury practice dealing exclusively with multi-track litigation. He has experience and knowledge comfortably beyond his year of call and his opponents are almost invariably considerably senior to him.

Having qualified as a doctor before coming to the Bar, Philip is particularly adept at dealing with cases involving catastrophic injuries and complex medical causation.

He has represented claimants across a full range of liability and quantum issues, including:

Road Traffic Accidents
Employers’ Liability
Occupiers’ Liability
Fundamental Dishonesty
Chronic Pain
Psychiatric Injury / Somatisation
Fatal Accidents
Lost Years Claims

Examples of his recent work include:

Currently representing a young Claimant who suffered a right ankle fracture and now requires a fusion before the age of 30. The claim is pleaded at c. £0.5m.
Currently representing a Claimant who suffered serious injuries in a fall at a recycling centre. The claim is pleaded in excess £1m.
Securing 6-figure settlement for Claimant who suffered multiple injuries in an RTA, including a mild TBI.
Securing settlement in excess of £200,000 at JSM for a Claimant who suffered pelvic fractures and chronic pain following an RTA.
Settling a complex somatisation case at JSM for the Claimant where causation and quantum remained in dispute.
Securing 6-figure settlement for Claimant who suffered a complex fracture of his right elbow in a fall at work. Liability remained in dispute at the time of settlement.
Successfully representing 3 claimants in a 2-day multi-track liability trial arising from a 3-year-old child being struck by a car and subsequently negotiating a favourable quantum settlement.

Philip has been recognised by Chambers and Partners as an Up and Coming Individual in Personal Injury since 2024.

Philip is willing to work on a nil-uplift Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA) basis where appropriate.

Philip has a well-established Defendant Personal Injury practice dealing almost exclusively with multi-track litigation. He has experience and knowledge comfortably beyond his year of call and his opponents are almost invariably considerably senior to him.

Having qualified as a doctor before coming to the Bar, Philip is particularly adept at dealing with cases involving catastrophic injuries and complex medical causation.

He represents defendants across a full range of liability and quantum issues, including:

Road Traffic Accidents
Employers’ Liability
Occupiers’ Liability
Fundamental Dishonesty
Chronic Pain
Psychiatric Injury / Somatisation
Fatal Accidents
Lost Years Claims

Examples of his recent work include:

Representing the Defendant in a claim involving unusual peripheral nerve injuries and complex loss of earnings. The matter settled for less than 25% of the pleaded value following service of a robust Counter Schedule drafted by Philip.
Successfully representing the Defendant in a 5-day High Court trial involving issues of fundamental dishonesty. The matter was settled on favourable terms part-way through Philip’s cross-examination of the Claimant.
Successfully representing a Defendant in a 2-day multi-track trial concerning an accident at work.
Representing the Defendant in a procedurally complex matter where the Claimant was a Litigant in Person who lacked capacity.

Philip has been recognised by Chambers and Partners as an Up and Coming Individual in Personal Injury since 2024.

Philip has a successful Clinical Negligence practice and is increasingly sought after to represent claimants and defendants. He works exclusively on matters of at least 6-figure value, often involving multiple experts and complex issues of liability and/or quantum. He also has experience as junior counsel.

He is increasingly sought after for his medical and legal expertise. He is able to utilise his qualification as a doctor to quickly identify, understand and advise on the key issues in cases, even whilst they remain in their infancy.

Examples of Philip’s recent work include:

Currently acting for the bereaved family of an individual who died of cardiac arrest following failure to identify and treat angina by his GPs and Health Board. The matter is pleaded at c. £0.75m.
Currently acting for the Defendant Health Board in a matter where the Claimant lost vision in his left eye following delayed diagnosis of meningioma.
Representing a Claimant who suffered a stroke following the failure of his GP surgery to identify and treat hypertension. The matter was recently successfully settled at JSM for in excess of £300,000.
Securing settlement in excess of £250,000 at JSM for a Claimant who underwent negligently performed ACL repair.
Currently acting for the Defendant Health Board in a case involving alleged delayed diagnosis of atrial septal defect in a newborn.
Advising the prospective Claimants in a contractual claim where a fertility clinic had inadvertently destroyed their IVF embryos.
Currently acting for a Claimant incorrectly diagnosed with epilepsy in the 1970s who has suffered brain injury by reason of the anti-epileptic drugs he was prescribed. The claim is pleaded in excess of £1m.
Securing favourable settlement for the widowed Claimant in a fatal accident claim arising from delayed diagnosis of multiple myeloma.

Philip is recognised by Legal 500 as a Leading Junior in Clinical Negligence.

Philip is willing to work on a nil-uplift Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA) basis where appropriate.

Philip has a growing Costs Litigation practice representing both paying and receiving parties across a full range of issues arising primarily from complex personal injury and clinical negligence litigation.

He undertakes CCMCs, represents parties at assessment, and advises on discrete costs issues at all stages of litigation.

Philip has experience representing a full range of interested parties at inquests, including families, Health Boards, NHS Trusts, and medical professionals.

Examples of recent inquests and coronial work he has been involved in include:

Representing the family at Article 2 inquest arising from the incorrect transfer of a Covid-negative patient to a Covid-positive ward. The Coroner was persuaded that the Deceased’s Article 2 rights had been breached.
Representing the Health Board in a multi-day inquest arising form the death of a young boy following delayed attendance of an ambulance.
Advising a coroner on judicial review proceedings brought against him for his decision to discontinue an investigation without holding an inquest.
Persuading the Coroner to issue a PFD report in circumstances where a care home resident had choked to death whilst being spoon-fed by a staff member.
Representing the family of a Deceased child in delicate circumstances where the question of possible suicide was raised.

In appropriate cases and where there are prospects of a successful civil claim, Philip is willing to undertake inquests on a nil uplift Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA) basis.

Related insights View all

Guildhall barristers ranked in Chambers UK 2026 Guide

16/10/2025

News

The New Legal 500 2026 Guide Ranks Guildhall Barristers

01/10/2025

News

The case of Holmes v Poeton: A Material Change to Material Contribution

06/02/2025 | Event: 06/03/2025

Events

Thank you to all our clients – Guildhall barristers ranked by The Legal 500 in 18 practice areas in the Western and London Bar

02/10/2024

News

For enquiries please contact

Stephen Arnold
Practice Director - Civil
0117 930 9000
Click here to email

Chloe Amson
Assistant Practice Manager - Personal Injury, Clinical Negligence and Court of Protection (Health & Welfare)
0117 930 9000
Click here to email

Rob McDonald
Practice Manager - Employment & Discrimination, Costs & Litigation Funding
0117 930 9000
Click here to email

“Philip always provides very comprehensive, thorough and easy to understand advice.”

Chambers & Partners 2024

“He provides an excellent level of service.”

Chambers & Partners 2024

“Philip Hughes is increasingly sought after for his medical expertise, which he has brought to bear…”

Legal 500 2024

MA (Hons) Cantab, MB, BChir, Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge
GDL (Distinction), BPP Law School
BPTC (Very Competent) BPP Law School

For help, please complete the form below.

A member of the clerking team will help you resolve your request.

Phone

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Name(Required)

First Last

Email(Required)

How can we help?(Required)

CAPTCHA

Frequently asked questions

If you have any queries about the services offered by Guildhall Chambers you are invited to contact the clerks at:

[email protected] or [email protected]. If you would prefer to telephone then please call 0117 930 9000 (the telephone number for the London office is 020 8087 1621).

For Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence specific enquiries, please email [email protected].

For Employment related enquiries, please email [email protected].

For Court of Protection enquiries, please email [email protected].

For Cost and Litigation enquiries, please email [email protected].

The following are invited to contact the clerks (as above) for our barristers’ services:

Solicitors;
Licensed Access clients, who may hold a licence issued by the Bar Standards Board, or be a members of a professional body which has been recognised by the Bar Standards Board; and
Members of the public who wish to instruct a barrister under the Public Access scheme.

We will provide you with a quote as soon as possible and, unless you are informed otherwise, within 14 days. If your matter is urgent please specify this when contacting chambers, and we will work to expedite your query. Guildhall Chambers are used to receiving and responding to work on an urgent basis.

Our barristers act both in advising clients and in representing clients in court. Barristers from Guildhall Chambers appear at all levels of the civil and criminal courts, including the Magistrates’ Court, the Crown Court, the County Court, the High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.

Our barristers act in criminal work for the Crown Prosecution Service (hereafter ‘CPS’) and other prosecuting agencies, as well as for Defendants, at all stages in the criminal justice process.

In civil work, our barristers act for both Claimants and Defendants at all levels of the civil justice system.

We also act for public bodies (particularly in Court of Protection work). Some of our members are members of the Attorney General’s Panel Scheme, which means that they can be instructed to act for the government.

Members of chambers also act for clients in cases heard in the Land Tribunal and in the Employment Tribunal.

If you have any questions about whether a barrister from Guildhall Chambers is able to represent you or has experience in representing clients in a particular area of law, or in a particular tribunal or court, then please do not hesitate to contact the clerks.

Public Access (also known as Direct Access)

If you are a member of the public, the Bar Standards Board’s Public Access Guidance for Law Clients is available here.

This guidance will help you to understand how the Public Access scheme works and explains how you can use it to instruct barristers directly.

Please note not all of our barristers act on a public access basis. Please check with the clerks and on the Public Access page on our website to see which barristers are able to act on a direct / public access basis.

We have barristers who are able to provide services on a public access basis including in the following areas:

What are the levels of fees to be charged for Public Access work?

Guildhall Chambers provides further information on the likely level of fees to be charged for specific areas of work if the barrister is instructed on a Public access basis. We provide this information in relation to work on a Public Access basis for:

Summary only motoring offences;
Employment tribunal work (in relation to unfair and wrongful dismissal cases);
Inheritance Act advices (where the value of the estate is less than £300,000);
Winding-up petitions

Please click on the relevant area to find out more information about the likely level of fees for the services of our barristers in these areas. This information is also available in hard copy format.

Please note that all of the above indicative fee information is still dependent upon the usual factors which may increase (or in some circumstances decrease) the likely cost of the barrister’s services.

Please read this information when considering the range of likely fees in these areas of Public Access work. For the most accurate information on the potential fees involved in your case, please contact the clerks.

If I instruct a barrister on a Direct Access basis, will there be any additional costs to pay or just the barrister’s fee?

It is also important to note that in relation to direct access work there may be costs, fees and/or charges which you will have to pay in addition to the fees which are payable to the barrister. In order to find out more about what (if any) additional costs arise, it is sensible to discuss this with the clerks (or the barrister who you instruct) at the outset.

Examples of additional charges which may be payable in addition to the direct access barrister’s fee include:

Court fees. Whether a court fee is payable (and how much that court fee will be) will depend on the circumstances of your case albeit in many (but not all) cases the value of the remedy which you are seeking will be a key factor;
There may occasionally be charges for photocopying and/or bundle preparation;

Barristers in the following teams most often charge on the following basis for the following areas of work (in each instance please contact the clerks to check that this system of charging will be applicable for your case):

Administrative and Public Law work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate.
Court of Protection work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate.
Clinical negligence and personal injury work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate.
Commercial work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate.
Costs and litigation funding work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate.
Criminal work on a private basis (where the client is not eligible for legal aid) is normally charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate fixed fee.
Employment and discrimination work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate for advisory work. Representation in court is most often charged on the basis of a fixed fee.
Insolvency work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate.
International and offshore work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate.
Property and estates work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate.
Regulatory and disciplinary work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate.
Sport law work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate.

Please note that this is guidance for the approach which is taken in most cases in the relevant area of work. It does not preclude the barrister from charging fees on an hourly rate or a fixed fee basis (as appropriate) where the circumstances of the case, the work which the barrister is required to undertake, and the nature of the instructions best suit that model.

All fees are charged exclusive of VAT (where applicable).

Please contact the clerks in the first instance for information about fees and fee quotes because they will be able to provide you with the clearest information about what the services from barristers at Guildhall Chambers may cost. The clerks will also be able to provide you with information about what may cause any fee quote or estimates to vary. The clerks can only provide you with a quote based on the information which you provide to them, so please endeavour to provide a written summary of the important aspects of your case.

All quotes will be provided within a reasonable time, and in any event the clerks will aim to provide a quote within 14 days. If you require work urgently, please inform the clerks about this when seeking a quote.

We will always aim to set out quotes clearly, but if you receive your quote and there is something that you do not understand, please do not hesitate to contact the clerks. There is also an enquiry form on our website which allows you to provide the clerks with information for the purposes of generating a quote for your case.

Barristers in chambers can charge on an hourly rate basis or on the basis of a fixed fee. However, unless a fixed fee is set when a barrister initially receives instructions to undertake work on your behalf, then the barrister will work on an hourly rate basis.

Do barristers at Guildhall Chambers work on a “no win, no fee” basis? Can I fund my case with legal insurance?

Our barristers will also accept instructions under conditional fee arrangements (colloquially known as ‘no win, no fee’ arrangements) however the barrister is not obliged to agree to work on this basis and will have to enter into a written agreement to that effect in order to do so. Please contact the clerks in order to discuss whether this is an arrangement which you would like to explore in the circumstances of your case.

If you have any queries about whether you have legal insurance available to you to cover your costs and/or provide funding in relation to your legal costs then please read the guidance provided by Legal Choices at https://www.legalchoices.org.uk/legal-choices/money-talks/after-the-event-insurance/.

Do any of the barristers at Guildhall Chambers work without requiring a fee?

Some barrister will work without requiring a fee from their client (this is referred to as “pro bono” work). However, barristers are not required to act on this basis. If this is something which you are interested in for the purposes of your case, then please contact the clerks. Please note that pro bono work is normally provided through the Pro Bono ‘Advocate’ Scheme. For more information on that scheme please follow this link https://weareadvocate.org.uk/ or call 020 7092 3960.

Do barristers at Guildhall Chambers provide their services to clients who are funded by the Legal Aid Agency?

Barristers at Guildhall Chambers do provide their services to clients who are funded by the Legal Aid Agency. If you are unsure whether you are eligible for legal aid then please see the legal aid eligibility calculator at https://www.gov.uk/check-legal-aid.

Please note that barristers cannot do legal aid work unless they have been instructed by a solicitor. However, just because your case is eligible for legal aid funding does not mean that you cannot choose to proceed under Public Access scheme.

Timescales for a case may vary depending on factors such as the availability of the barrister, the type and the complexity of the case, the approach of the other side and court waiting times. Whilst all barristers will aim to complete any written and/or advisory services required on a case within 28 days this will not be possible in all cases. If there is a particular deadline then this must be raised and agreed with the barrister when any instructions are given to the barrister.

Please note that due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic many cases (both civil and criminal) have been delayed and there are significant backlogs in the system. Whilst this will not usually alter the timescales for the services which barristers at Guildhall Chambers will provide, it may mean that timescales given in relation to the progress of your case through the courts will be affected.

Whether the fees are to be charged on an hourly rate or a fixed fee basis there will be certain factors which may increase the level of work involved, and therefore the fees which are likely to be charged (or the number of hours involved). Those factors include:

The seniority of barrister required for your case. The more experienced the barrister (which is normally calculated on the number of years since they were called to the bar) the higher the likely level of fees to be charged.
The number of papers involved in the case and/or the complexity of the factual issues involved.
The time in which you require the work to be turned around and/or the services to be provided. More urgent work will often involve a higher level of fee (for example if this involves the barrister working over a weekend or prioritising your case over other work).
The amount of time that your case will require the barrister to be in court.
The amount of travel time required for the barrister to get to and from court. Travel time is usually charged at half the barrister’s hourly rate.
The complexity of the legal issues involved.
The significance of the case more generally, for example if the case has wider ramifications for the client generally and/or public or legal significance.

If you are concerned about the level of fees which may be involved in your case please inform the clerks at the earliest opportunity who will be able to discuss with the barrister how costs can be managed on the case.

Please not that fee indications are (unless expressly agreed otherwise) not “caps”, and if a barrister is required to do work on the case, then they will charge accordingly. We will always aim to inform you if the fees on the case are likely to exceed the fee quotes or estimates previously provided.

The best way to manage the level of the fees is to discuss the circumstances of your case (including any issues regarding fees) with the clerks when initially seeking to instruct a barrister.

Barristers at Guildhall Chambers are regulated by the Bar Standards Board (hereafter ‘BSB’). You can contact the BSB at 289-293 High Holborn, London, WC1V 7HZ or by telephone on 020 7611 1444. Please follow this link to the BSB website:
https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk.

If you are interested in seeing: (i) whether a barrister has a current practising certificate or (ii) whether a barrister has any disciplinary findings (which are published on the BSB website) then you can search the Barristers’ Register on the Bar Standards Board website.

What is the complaints procedure at Guildhall Chambers, and do I have any further rights of redress if I am unhappy with how my complaint has been handled?

If you have any complaint about the services provided by a barrister at Guildhall Chambers, then please read our complaints procedure or download a pdf copy

.

Guildhall Chambers have premises in both London and Bristol. Please find the addresses for our offices below:

Bristol offices:

5-8 Broad Street
Bristol
BS1 2HG

23 Broad Street
Bristol
BS1 2HG

London office:

Central Court
Southampton Buildings
London
WC2A 1AL

It is advisable to contact the Bristol offices in the first instance, because Guildhall Chambers do not have a permanent staff presence at the London office (although calls will be forwarded from the London office). This does not inhibit barristers from Guildhall Chambers from representing London clients or in appearing very frequently in the courts in London.

Dr Philip Hughes

For enquiries please contact

Expertise

Related insights View all

Guildhall barristers ranked in Chambers UK 2026 Guide

The New Legal 500 2026 Guide Ranks Guildhall Barristers

The case of Holmes v Poeton: A Material Change to Material Contribution

Thank you to all our clients – Guildhall barristers ranked by The Legal 500 in 18 practice areas in the Western and London Bar

For enquiries please contact

For help, please complete the form below.

Frequently asked questions

Do barristers at Guildhall Chambers work on a “no win, no fee” basis? Can I fund my case with legal insurance?

Do any of the barristers at Guildhall Chambers work without requiring a fee?

Do barristers at Guildhall Chambers provide their services to clients who are funded by the Legal Aid Agency?

Guildhall Chambers

Expertise

Insights

Careers

Search

Dr Philip Hughes

For enquiries please contact

Education

Expertise

Personal Injury - Claimant

Personal Injury - Defendant

Clinical Negligence

Costs & Litigation Funding

Inquests

Related insights View all

Guildhall barristers ranked in Chambers UK 2026 Guide

The New Legal 500 2026 Guide Ranks Guildhall Barristers

The case of Holmes v Poeton: A Material Change to Material Contribution

Thank you to all our clients – Guildhall barristers ranked by The Legal 500 in 18 practice areas in the Western and London Bar

For enquiries please contact

Education

For help, please complete the form below.

Frequently asked questions

How do I contact chambers and your clerks?

What services do barristers from Guildhall Chambers provide?

What is Public Access (Direct Access)?

How are fees calculated for different areas of work?

How do quotes and fees at Guildhall Chambers work?

Do barristers at Guildhall Chambers work on a “no win, no fee” basis? Can I fund my case with legal insurance?

Do any of the barristers at Guildhall Chambers work without requiring a fee?

Do barristers at Guildhall Chambers provide their services to clients who are funded by the Legal Aid Agency?

Do you have timescales for the services which you provide?

What will increase the level of fees to be paid on a case?

Who regulates the barristers at Guildhall Chambers?

What is the complaints procedure at Guildhall Chambers?

Where is Guildhall Chambers based?

Guildhall Chambers

Expertise

Insights

Careers

Search