bg

Independent Workplace Investigations: after the report comes in

04/09/2025

This is the third of Liz Cunningham’s articles about best practice when doing Independent Investigations.

The first two can be found here:

Why use Counsel for independent workplace investigations? – Guildhall Chambers

Independent Investigations: The importance of Terms of Reference – Guildhall Chambers

By Liz Cunningham

AFTER THE REPORT COMES IN…

Nothing will dissolve engagement among staff quite like an investigation ‘that didn’t make any difference’ or outcomes and findings that were ‘just ignored’.

When an organisation has taken the time and invested the resources to commission an independent investigation, the returns will only come if there is a plan about what happens next. So, whilst the investigation is happening – but separate from it! – the employer must do some scenario planning and work through issues such as:

  • Worst-case scenario…all findings upheld…do we need to suspend?
  • Best-case scenario…findings not upheld…how do we communicate this supportively and in a way that protects all the workplace relationships?
  • Mediation…might that be needed…let’s find a possible mediator now, not a month after the report comes in.
  • If a disciplinary process is going to be invoked…identify the hearing and appeal panels now.
  • How will we communicate the outcome? Which stakeholders need to know and how much do they need to know?
  • What is our approach to post-investigation confidentiality and what if we get a request from interviewees to see the report?

These are just some questions that should be thrown up by an investigation process where more complex matters are being considered, and they are matters which even the most experienced HR Teams will find challenging. On the last bullet point, the Red Bull investigation into alleged harassment by Christian Horner – carried out (in record time!) by an unnamed KC, and that made unpublished findings – might well have seen the directors able to rub their hands and ‘move on’, but the optics were not good and it backfired in that it generated allegations of a ‘fix’ and damaged the brand’s credentials as a fair and progressive employer.

As part of the initial scoping, an investigation process should include a plan that runs alongside what the investigator is doing so that when the report comes in, it is immediately reviewed and actioned. This means the investigation process delivers its full value. Whether you are the employer or you are working with a client as they navigate an investigation process, a clear post-investigation plan is crucial and this should include a ‘dissemination and communication’ strategy. The Post Office learned the importance of failing to do this and the public inquiry has illuminated how serious that shortcoming was.

Whilst remaining independent, I regularly work with commissioning managers to develop a fair post-investigation ‘action and communication’ plan – it’s part of my job to help organisations to get the most out of the work I have done; meeting the needs of the alleged perpetrator and the needs of the organisation and maintaining or healing workplace relationships, is part of the post-investigation debrief.

If you need assistance with drafting Terms of Reference or conducting an independent investigation, please feel free to reach out. Our team is here to support you every step of the way.

Sign up

To be kept up-to-date with our latest news and future events, please complete the short form.

Register

Follow

For help, please complete the form below.

A member of the clerking team will help you resolve your request.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name(Required)

Frequently asked questions

Menu

Close

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)