Ollie Murrell

Call 2022

“Ollie is extremely knowledgeable, excellent at communicating and leaves no point unexamined, making him a go-to for real estate litigation matters. Clients quickly understand the value Ollie brings to their legal team."

Contact Ollie

0117 930 9000

For enquiries please contact

Stephen Arnold
Practice Director - Civil
0117 930 9000
Click here to email

Joe Stayte
Practice Manager - Commercial, Insolvency, Property & Estates, Court of Protection (Property & Affairs)
0117 930 9000
Click here to email

Charlotte Blair
Practice Manager - Commercial, Insolvency, Property & Estates, Court of Protection (Property & Affairs)
0117 930 9000
Click here to email

Rachael Allen
Assistant Practice Manager - Commercial, Insolvency, Property & Estates, Court of Protection (Property & Affairs)
0117 930 9000
Click here to email

Lincoln’s Inn Droop Scholarship
Lincoln’s Inn Law Journal Prize
Newcastle Business & Property Court Forum Prize
Clyde & Co Prize for Maritime Law
John Theodore Hoyle Prize for Inquests
Equity & Trusts Prize

LLB: 1st Class (Honours)
LLM: Distinction
Bar Vocational Course (Distinction)

Chancery Bar Association
Contentious Trusts Association

Ollie is a chancery and commercial barrister, specialising in private client, real estate, agriculture, and commercial disputes. He also acts in insolvency and professional negligence matters. A number of Ollie’s cases involve fraud allegations; he has particular experience of forgery and document manipulation allegations.

Ollie is frequently instructed in High Court litigation and in the Property Tribunals, often in high value claims. He is an experienced trial advocate at all levels of Court and Tribunal, having recently acted for the successful claimant in Packer v Packer [2025] EWHC 461 (Ch), and is regularly instructed to act in urgent and ex parte injunctions.

Ollie is a co-author of ‘A Practical Guide to Missing People and the Administration of Estates’ and sits on the committee of the Contentious Trusts Association.

Expertise

Ollie regularly represents and advises trustees and personal representatives, beneficiaries, and professional advisors in relation to:

Administration of trusts and estates.
Inheritance tax and associated taxation of trusts and estates.
Contentious and non-contentious trusts and estates applications.
Claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.
Claims concerning the substantive and formal validity of wills (formalities, testamentary capacity, knowledge and approval, undue influence, fraudulent calumny and other fraud).
Challenges to lifetime gifts and creation of trusts.
Construction of trust documents and wills etc, and consequential applications.
Duties and powers of trustees/personal representatives, including breach of trust and fiduciary duties.
Trusts of land and proprietary estoppel in domestic, commercial and mixed contexts.

Examples of Ollie’s recent cases:

Probate claim by a partner/cohabitee seeking to propound two wills in her favour, partly to the exclusion of the deceased’s children, challenged on grounds of undue influence, capacity, knowledge and approval, and due execution. The estate is believed to be valued at £4m.
Inheritance Act 1975 claim by a minor for provision from a £3m estate, complicated by the deceased having multiple Sharia Law families, foreign real estate, and the succession law of several Islamic countries.
Proprietary estoppel claim to a significant caravan park business and land arising from an invalid will in the deceased’s step-son’s favour.
Forfeiture claim brought by a creditor/specific legatee following the testator’s suicide.
Claim to set-aside five wills and the trust settlement for lack of capacity and want of knowledge and approval relating to a £1.2m estate and c.£1m trust. Involved complex capacity issues arising from the testator/donor’s head injury before making the wills/trusts.
3-day trial of a cohabitee claim under the Inheritance Act 1975 arising from no provision being made in the deceased’s will. Ollie acted for the successful cohabitee was actively opposed by the deceased’s children.
Ollie has advised on and acted in a number of matters concerning missing/untraceable persons and the consequent implications for trusts and estates. He is the co-author of ‘A Practical Guide to Missing People and the Administration of Estates’.

Featured Trusts, Wills, Probate and Inheritance cases

Debra Packer v Lynn Packer [2025] EWHC 461 (Ch)

Probate/fraud claim in which Ollie successfully acted for Debra who was granted letters of administration. Lynn sought to propound two draft wills; the executed versions not being located on death. The High Court pronounced against the wills as they were not validly executed, the presumption of revocation was not rebutted, and the deceased likely destroyed the draft wills. Lynn abandoned allegations of fraud and will destruction by Debra in closing submissions.

Bedford v Grieg [2025] UKFTT 1302 (PC)

Acted for a cohabitee in an application for Form A and Form II restrictions against the title of his deceased partner’s property on the basis he had a beneficial interest under a constructive/resulting trust or proprietary estoppel.

Lamb v (1) Jackson, (2) Lamb (2025, CLCC)

Ollie acted for the successful Second Defendant in a 4-day trial concerning the validity of a will (challenged on forgery/capacity grounds), abuse of an LPA, and a bare/resulting trust claim to the deceased’s home.

Ollie has litigation and advisory experience across the full range of real property and land-related matters, including:

Contentious and non-contentious advice relating to restrictive covenants (including discharge) and easements.
Adverse possession of registered and unregistered land.
Boundary disputes.
Land options, rights of pre-emption, overage clauses and similar mechanisms.
Land registration and alteration/rectification of the Register.
Mortgages and charges.
Trespass, nuisance and related property torts.
All elements of commercial and residential landlord and tenant work.
The full range of agricultural disputes, including farm business tenancies, agricultural holdings, farming partnerships, statutory nuisance, and agricultural-related contracts and transactions.
Ollie is particularly noted for his experience in disputes regarding the Party Wall etc Act 1996, including appeals from surveyors’ determination, jurisdictional challenges and injunctive proceedings.

The following is a selection of his recent cases:

Acting for the estate of a farmer/land owner in wide-ranging proceedings in the High Court and County Court involving the validity of agricultural/farm business tenancies, proprietary estoppel claims to options to purchased farmland, and complex capacity issues.
High Court administration proceedings arising from a fraudulent investment scheme, concerning the correct characterisation and transmission of land options, validity of unilateral notices, and whether put options/covenants are “security” under the Insolvency Act 1986.
Proprietary estoppel claim to a significant caravan park business and land arising from an invalid will in the deceased’s step-son’s favour.
3-day trial regarding a boundary dispute, the scope of an adverse possession defence, and the effect of delay on injunctive relief.
2-day trial in the First Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) concerning the reasonableness of service charges and the interpretation of insurance provisions in 26 long-leases.
Urgent injunction in the High Court and subsequent proceedings to restrain a breach of the Party Wall etc Act 1996, breach of covenant and nuisance.

Featured Real Property and Agriculture cases

Lord St Levan v Clemo

Ollie acted for Mr Clemo in highly publicised proceedings by the Lord St Levan for possession of land, resisted on the basis of adverse possession and proprietary estoppel The proceedings were reported in the Daily Mail, BBC and local newspapers.

Bedford v Grieg [2025] UKFTT 1302 (PC)

Acted for a cohabitee in an application for Form A and Form II restrictions against the title of his deceased partner’s property on the basis he had a beneficial interest under a constructive/resulting trust or proprietary estoppel.

Ollie has acted and advised in disputes across the following areas:

All types of contractual disputes.
Pensions, mortgages, asset finance and other financial products.
Financial services and consumer credit.
Business protection including employee covenants.
Company and corporate disputes (directors’ duties and misfeasance claims, unfair prejudice and other shareholder disputes).
Construction, ranging from domestic building claims to significant commercial construction disputes.
Civil fraud and asset recovery.
Unjust enrichment and restitution.
Defamation and data protection.

Ollie’s recent experience includes:

Urgent injunction and subsequent claim in a shareholder/director dispute involving allegations of fraudulent creation of shareholder agreements, breach of directors’ duties, and the improper removal of a director.
Urgent injunction by a billion-pound trading platform in business-to-business claim arising from breach of employee covenants, procuring breach of contract, conspiracy, and knowing receipt (instructed against a KC).
Proceedings arising from an extortion racket. Ollie acts for a company/director seeking to rescind various transfers and agreements on the basis of fraudulent misrepresentation, fraud/forgery and duress, alongside injunctive relief to prevent ongoing extortion.
Director/shareholder dispute arising from a failed joint venture defending a substantial claim for unpaid contributions under the joint venture agreement on capacity grounds and accounting errors.
Prepared and acted in adjudication proceedings concerning a major road infrastructure project, resulting in an award of £1.1m.
Fraudulent misrepresentation claim valued between £500k-£1m arising from a construction project regarding inflated and fake invoices submitted by a company director.

Ollie acts in a broad range of insolvency matters arising out of bankruptcy and corporate insolvency. Ollie is particularly well placed to act in insolvency matters which have property, trusts and/or estates elements or arise from that context.

The following is a sample of Ollie’s recent experience:

High Court administration action arising from a fraudulent investment scheme. Involved several novel issues, including: whether options/covenants are “security” within the Insolvency Act 1986; the rights of option holders in an administration; and whether put options fall within para 71, schedule B1 (led by Stefan Ramel).
Represented administrators in an urgent injunction brought by a former company director to frustrate the realisation and sale of company assets.
Represented a Right to Manage company in a claim under ss.212 and 214 Insolvency Act 1986 arising from fraudulent trading by a director.
Represented joint liquidators in a claim under s.127 Insolvency Act 1986 to recover a void disposition paid to a shadow director.
Obtained an urgent injunction in the High Court to restrain the presentation of a winding up petition.
Advised receivers and various creditors on the appropriate strategy for defending a claim calculated to jeopardise a restructuring plan.
Resisted a winding-up petition against a Northern Irish company on jurisdictional grounds
Various complex possession and sale applications.

Ollie has a broad professional negligence practice involving a range of professional advisors including: solicitors and barristers; surveyors, architects and other construction professionals; insurers; veterinarians; estate agents and conveyancers; and auctioneers.

Ollie’s recent experience includes:

Solicitor negligence claim arising from an assumed duty of care to an estate beneficiary and negligent advice which led to the beneficiary wrongly settling time-barred debts. Ollie acted for the successful beneficiary at trial.
Disappointed beneficiary claim against a will draftsman following a failure to adequately advise on lifetime transfers and irregularities in the drafting of five wills resulting in a series of post-death claims.
Negligent conveyancing claim arising from a failure to identify a development site was landlocked with no rights of access.
Fraudulent misrepresentation claim against a struck-off solicitor holding out as a practising solicitor whilst advising on and conducting litigation.
Negligent veterinarian claim arising from a failure to diagnose Avian Flu in turkeys, resulting in the cull of an entire turkey and goose farm shortly before Christmas.
Negligent architect claim following a series of design failures in the conversion of residential properties into holiday lets.
Numerous claims involving negligent builders relating to a variety of domestic and commercial construction projects.
Ollie regularly acts and advises on claims by and against conveyancers arising from residential and commercial property.

Related insights View all

10 members included in the Pro Bono Recognition List 2026

20/04/2026

News

James Fuller & Ollie Murrell Announce Their Upcoming book: ‘A Practical Guide to Missing Persons and the Administration of Estates’

18/12/2025

News

Guildhall Chambers Cheltenham Estates Roadshow

03/09/2025 | Event: 23/10/2025

Events

Bristol Estates Roadshow in collaboration with VWV

23/05/2025 | Event: 17/07/2025

Events

For enquiries please contact

Stephen Arnold
Practice Director - Civil
0117 930 9000
Click here to email

Joe Stayte
Practice Manager - Commercial, Insolvency, Property & Estates, Court of Protection (Property & Affairs)
0117 930 9000
Click here to email

Charlotte Blair
Practice Manager - Commercial, Insolvency, Property & Estates, Court of Protection (Property & Affairs)
0117 930 9000
Click here to email

Rachael Allen
Assistant Practice Manager - Commercial, Insolvency, Property & Estates, Court of Protection (Property & Affairs)
0117 930 9000
Click here to email

Lincoln’s Inn Droop Scholarship
Lincoln’s Inn Law Journal Prize
Newcastle Business & Property Court Forum Prize
Clyde & Co Prize for Maritime Law
John Theodore Hoyle Prize for Inquests
Equity & Trusts Prize

LLB: 1st Class (Honours)
LLM: Distinction
Bar Vocational Course (Distinction)

Chancery Bar Association
Contentious Trusts Association

For help, please complete the form below.

A member of the clerking team will help you resolve your request.

Name

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Name(Required)

First Last

Email(Required)

How can we help?(Required)

CAPTCHA

Frequently asked questions

If you have any queries about the services offered by Guildhall Chambers you are invited to contact the clerks at:

[email protected] or [email protected]. If you would prefer to telephone then please call 0117 930 9000 (the telephone number for the London office is 020 8087 1621).

For Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence specific enquiries, please email [email protected].

For Employment related enquiries, please email [email protected].

For Court of Protection enquiries, please email [email protected].

For Cost and Litigation enquiries, please email [email protected].

The following are invited to contact the clerks (as above) for our barristers’ services:

Solicitors;
Licensed Access clients, who may hold a licence issued by the Bar Standards Board, or be a members of a professional body which has been recognised by the Bar Standards Board; and
Members of the public who wish to instruct a barrister under the Public Access scheme.

We will provide you with a quote as soon as possible and, unless you are informed otherwise, within 14 days. If your matter is urgent please specify this when contacting chambers, and we will work to expedite your query. Guildhall Chambers are used to receiving and responding to work on an urgent basis.

Our barristers act both in advising clients and in representing clients in court. Barristers from Guildhall Chambers appear at all levels of the civil and criminal courts, including the Magistrates’ Court, the Crown Court, the County Court, the High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.

Our barristers act in criminal work for the Crown Prosecution Service (hereafter ‘CPS’) and other prosecuting agencies, as well as for Defendants, at all stages in the criminal justice process.

In civil work, our barristers act for both Claimants and Defendants at all levels of the civil justice system.

We also act for public bodies (particularly in Court of Protection work). Some of our members are members of the Attorney General’s Panel Scheme, which means that they can be instructed to act for the government.

Members of chambers also act for clients in cases heard in the Land Tribunal and in the Employment Tribunal.

If you have any questions about whether a barrister from Guildhall Chambers is able to represent you or has experience in representing clients in a particular area of law, or in a particular tribunal or court, then please do not hesitate to contact the clerks.

Public Access (also known as Direct Access)

If you are a member of the public, the Bar Standards Board’s Public Access Guidance for Law Clients is available here.

This guidance will help you to understand how the Public Access scheme works and explains how you can use it to instruct barristers directly.

Please note not all of our barristers act on a public access basis. Please check with the clerks and on the Public Access page on our website to see which barristers are able to act on a direct / public access basis.

We have barristers who are able to provide services on a public access basis including in the following areas:

What are the levels of fees to be charged for Public Access work?

Guildhall Chambers provides further information on the likely level of fees to be charged for specific areas of work if the barrister is instructed on a Public access basis. We provide this information in relation to work on a Public Access basis for:

Summary only motoring offences;
Employment tribunal work (in relation to unfair and wrongful dismissal cases);
Inheritance Act advices (where the value of the estate is less than £300,000);
Winding-up petitions

Please click on the relevant area to find out more information about the likely level of fees for the services of our barristers in these areas. This information is also available in hard copy format.

Please note that all of the above indicative fee information is still dependent upon the usual factors which may increase (or in some circumstances decrease) the likely cost of the barrister’s services.

Please read this information when considering the range of likely fees in these areas of Public Access work. For the most accurate information on the potential fees involved in your case, please contact the clerks.

If I instruct a barrister on a Direct Access basis, will there be any additional costs to pay or just the barrister’s fee?

It is also important to note that in relation to direct access work there may be costs, fees and/or charges which you will have to pay in addition to the fees which are payable to the barrister. In order to find out more about what (if any) additional costs arise, it is sensible to discuss this with the clerks (or the barrister who you instruct) at the outset.

Examples of additional charges which may be payable in addition to the direct access barrister’s fee include:

Court fees. Whether a court fee is payable (and how much that court fee will be) will depend on the circumstances of your case albeit in many (but not all) cases the value of the remedy which you are seeking will be a key factor;
There may occasionally be charges for photocopying and/or bundle preparation;

Barristers in the following teams most often charge on the following basis for the following areas of work (in each instance please contact the clerks to check that this system of charging will be applicable for your case):

Administrative and Public Law work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate.
Court of Protection work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate.
Clinical negligence and personal injury work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate.
Commercial work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate.
Costs and litigation funding work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate.
Criminal work on a private basis (where the client is not eligible for legal aid) is normally charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate fixed fee.
Employment and discrimination work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate for advisory work. Representation in court is most often charged on the basis of a fixed fee.
Insolvency work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate.
International and offshore work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate.
Property and estates work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate.
Regulatory and disciplinary work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate.
Sport law work is most often charged (or calculated) on the basis of an hourly rate.

Please note that this is guidance for the approach which is taken in most cases in the relevant area of work. It does not preclude the barrister from charging fees on an hourly rate or a fixed fee basis (as appropriate) where the circumstances of the case, the work which the barrister is required to undertake, and the nature of the instructions best suit that model.

All fees are charged exclusive of VAT (where applicable).

Please contact the clerks in the first instance for information about fees and fee quotes because they will be able to provide you with the clearest information about what the services from barristers at Guildhall Chambers may cost. The clerks will also be able to provide you with information about what may cause any fee quote or estimates to vary. The clerks can only provide you with a quote based on the information which you provide to them, so please endeavour to provide a written summary of the important aspects of your case.

All quotes will be provided within a reasonable time, and in any event the clerks will aim to provide a quote within 14 days. If you require work urgently, please inform the clerks about this when seeking a quote.

We will always aim to set out quotes clearly, but if you receive your quote and there is something that you do not understand, please do not hesitate to contact the clerks. There is also an enquiry form on our website which allows you to provide the clerks with information for the purposes of generating a quote for your case.

Barristers in chambers can charge on an hourly rate basis or on the basis of a fixed fee. However, unless a fixed fee is set when a barrister initially receives instructions to undertake work on your behalf, then the barrister will work on an hourly rate basis.

Do barristers at Guildhall Chambers work on a “no win, no fee” basis? Can I fund my case with legal insurance?

Our barristers will also accept instructions under conditional fee arrangements (colloquially known as ‘no win, no fee’ arrangements) however the barrister is not obliged to agree to work on this basis and will have to enter into a written agreement to that effect in order to do so. Please contact the clerks in order to discuss whether this is an arrangement which you would like to explore in the circumstances of your case.

If you have any queries about whether you have legal insurance available to you to cover your costs and/or provide funding in relation to your legal costs then please read the guidance provided by Legal Choices at https://www.legalchoices.org.uk/legal-choices/money-talks/after-the-event-insurance/.

Do any of the barristers at Guildhall Chambers work without requiring a fee?

Some barrister will work without requiring a fee from their client (this is referred to as “pro bono” work). However, barristers are not required to act on this basis. If this is something which you are interested in for the purposes of your case, then please contact the clerks. Please note that pro bono work is normally provided through the Pro Bono ‘Advocate’ Scheme. For more information on that scheme please follow this link https://weareadvocate.org.uk/ or call 020 7092 3960.

Do barristers at Guildhall Chambers provide their services to clients who are funded by the Legal Aid Agency?

Barristers at Guildhall Chambers do provide their services to clients who are funded by the Legal Aid Agency. If you are unsure whether you are eligible for legal aid then please see the legal aid eligibility calculator at https://www.gov.uk/check-legal-aid.

Please note that barristers cannot do legal aid work unless they have been instructed by a solicitor. However, just because your case is eligible for legal aid funding does not mean that you cannot choose to proceed under Public Access scheme.

Timescales for a case may vary depending on factors such as the availability of the barrister, the type and the complexity of the case, the approach of the other side and court waiting times. Whilst all barristers will aim to complete any written and/or advisory services required on a case within 28 days this will not be possible in all cases. If there is a particular deadline then this must be raised and agreed with the barrister when any instructions are given to the barrister.

Please note that due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic many cases (both civil and criminal) have been delayed and there are significant backlogs in the system. Whilst this will not usually alter the timescales for the services which barristers at Guildhall Chambers will provide, it may mean that timescales given in relation to the progress of your case through the courts will be affected.

Whether the fees are to be charged on an hourly rate or a fixed fee basis there will be certain factors which may increase the level of work involved, and therefore the fees which are likely to be charged (or the number of hours involved). Those factors include:

The seniority of barrister required for your case. The more experienced the barrister (which is normally calculated on the number of years since they were called to the bar) the higher the likely level of fees to be charged.
The number of papers involved in the case and/or the complexity of the factual issues involved.
The time in which you require the work to be turned around and/or the services to be provided. More urgent work will often involve a higher level of fee (for example if this involves the barrister working over a weekend or prioritising your case over other work).
The amount of time that your case will require the barrister to be in court.
The amount of travel time required for the barrister to get to and from court. Travel time is usually charged at half the barrister’s hourly rate.
The complexity of the legal issues involved.
The significance of the case more generally, for example if the case has wider ramifications for the client generally and/or public or legal significance.

If you are concerned about the level of fees which may be involved in your case please inform the clerks at the earliest opportunity who will be able to discuss with the barrister how costs can be managed on the case.

Please not that fee indications are (unless expressly agreed otherwise) not “caps”, and if a barrister is required to do work on the case, then they will charge accordingly. We will always aim to inform you if the fees on the case are likely to exceed the fee quotes or estimates previously provided.

The best way to manage the level of the fees is to discuss the circumstances of your case (including any issues regarding fees) with the clerks when initially seeking to instruct a barrister.

Barristers at Guildhall Chambers are regulated by the Bar Standards Board (hereafter ‘BSB’). You can contact the BSB at 289-293 High Holborn, London, WC1V 7HZ or by telephone on 020 7611 1444. Please follow this link to the BSB website:
https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk.

If you are interested in seeing: (i) whether a barrister has a current practising certificate or (ii) whether a barrister has any disciplinary findings (which are published on the BSB website) then you can search the Barristers’ Register on the Bar Standards Board website.

What is the complaints procedure at Guildhall Chambers, and do I have any further rights of redress if I am unhappy with how my complaint has been handled?

If you have any complaint about the services provided by a barrister at Guildhall Chambers, then please read our complaints procedure or download a pdf copy

.

Guildhall Chambers have premises in both London and Bristol. Please find the addresses for our offices below:

Bristol offices:

5-8 Broad Street
Bristol
BS1 2HG

London office:

Thanet House
231-232 Strand
Temple
London
WC2R 1DA

It is advisable to contact the Bristol offices in the first instance, because Guildhall Chambers do not have a permanent staff presence at the London office (although calls will be forwarded from the London office). This does not inhibit barristers from Guildhall Chambers from representing London clients or in appearing very frequently in the courts in London.

Ollie Murrell

For enquiries please contact

Expertise

Featured Trusts, Wills, Probate and Inheritance cases

Featured Real Property and Agriculture cases

Related insights View all

10 members included in the Pro Bono Recognition List 2026

James Fuller & Ollie Murrell Announce Their Upcoming book: ‘A Practical Guide to Missing Persons and the Administration of Estates’

Guildhall Chambers Cheltenham Estates Roadshow

Bristol Estates Roadshow in collaboration with VWV

For enquiries please contact

For help, please complete the form below.

Frequently asked questions

Do barristers at Guildhall Chambers work on a “no win, no fee” basis? Can I fund my case with legal insurance?

Do any of the barristers at Guildhall Chambers work without requiring a fee?

Do barristers at Guildhall Chambers provide their services to clients who are funded by the Legal Aid Agency?

Guildhall Chambers

Expertise

Insights

Careers

Search

Ollie Murrell

For enquiries please contact

Awards

Education

Memberships

Expertise

Trusts, Wills, Probate and Inheritance

Featured Trusts, Wills, Probate and Inheritance cases

Real Property and Agriculture

Featured Real Property and Agriculture cases

Commercial Dispute Resolution

Insolvency and Restructuring

Professional Negligence

Related insights View all

10 members included in the Pro Bono Recognition List 2026

James Fuller & Ollie Murrell Announce Their Upcoming book: ‘A Practical Guide to Missing Persons and the Administration of Estates’

Guildhall Chambers Cheltenham Estates Roadshow

Bristol Estates Roadshow in collaboration with VWV

For enquiries please contact

Awards

Education

Memberships

For help, please complete the form below.

Frequently asked questions

How do I contact chambers and your clerks?

What services do barristers from Guildhall Chambers provide?

What is Public Access (Direct Access)?

How are fees calculated for different areas of work?

How do quotes and fees at Guildhall Chambers work?

Do barristers at Guildhall Chambers work on a “no win, no fee” basis? Can I fund my case with legal insurance?

Do any of the barristers at Guildhall Chambers work without requiring a fee?

Do barristers at Guildhall Chambers provide their services to clients who are funded by the Legal Aid Agency?

Do you have timescales for the services which you provide?

What will increase the level of fees to be paid on a case?

Who regulates the barristers at Guildhall Chambers?

What is the complaints procedure at Guildhall Chambers?

Where is Guildhall Chambers based?

Guildhall Chambers

Expertise

Insights

Careers

Search